Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:03

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Apple is on defense at WWDC 2025 - The Verge
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why do ugly men flirt with girls that are really hot?
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
8 best walking exercises that will help us lose 3-4 kgs within a month - Times of India
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Elden Ring Nightreign Patch Notes Include Promised Improvements For Solo Play - GameSpot
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Music legend cancels concerts after coming out of retirement - Syracuse.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are the ways in which the human body adapts to different climates and heat?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Would you let your partner cheat on you every now and again?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Is it mandatory for restaurants to wash glasses after every use?